Last week I wrote a fairly in-depth post about the problems with the Flu shot, and the lack of scientific proof that it is safe or effective.
I touched on the untested carcinogenic potential of the Flu shot, and I’d like to break that down with the CDC recommended childhood vaccine schedule today.
As a mom, I know this sucks to read, but cancer is the leading cause of death in our children under the age of 14. And, despite the fact that some people will try to obscure the truth by using stable death rates ( meaning, even though our cancer rates have skyrocketed, about the same number of children die of cancer today as they did back in the 70’s ) cancer rates are still steadily climbing higher and higher.
I’d like to help connect the dots between one issue that, by design, generally isn’t recognized by the public. The issue is the carcinogenic potential of our current vaccination schedule.
Let me start by saying again that this topic isn’t cool. I know. I’m a mom, and to be honest with you, without the experiences I’ve had, I wouldn’t be here writing about this today. I’d probably be like the majority of Americans, smack dab in the middle of a war between two vocal groups: pro-vaccine extremists and anti-vaccine extremists.
Fortunately for you, I’m in neither of those radical camps. I am simply a mom who watched her son regress into autistic behaviors after his shots, and started reading. I still remember feeling uneasy in my gut, thinking there was a possible connection to his shots, and rationalizing those feelings and first hand experiences away with the slogan “doctors know best”.
Since that time I’ve learned some things about the vaccine industry that sound so radical and twisted you might just think Stephen King himself made it all up.
Recently I went through a 6 week intensive study course and received my certification as a Vaccine Education Specialist for the sole reason that I care about the future of our country, as well as your family. It is my mission to get information into the hands of uncertain moms and dads; that moms and dads and the whole United States of America will one day wake up, rise up, and once again demand better for our children and the world.
Here’s what you didn’t know about childhood vaccines and cancer
The carcinogenic potential of individual vaccines, let alone the vaccine schedule as a whole, has never been tested or evaluated in any way.
That means that neither your doctor nor the people formulating and manufacturing the vaccines can assure you that they will not cause cancer in your child, or yourself. How do I know this? Because it says so right there in any vaccine package insert.
This is ON record, no one, not even your doctor, will deny it.
And what makes this lack of safety testing so completely and utterly unacceptable is the fact that you are bullied into vaccines every time you step into an allopathic doctors office, yet these vaccines actually contain carcinogens.
Now, let me break this down so you can see that I’m not sensationalizing things here.
While the vaccine cocktails themselves have not been evaluated for carcinogenic potential, some of the individual ingredients in the vaccines are known carcinogens.
That’s right. Known carcinogens are being directly injected into our children via “life-saving” vaccines. How is that not sickly ironic?
Let’s go over the basic list, and de-mistify some of what you might have heard about this. Keep in mind there is a long list of neurotoxins and mutagens ( substances that cause gene mutation ) in vaccines as well, but for now we’re going to exclusively focus on the ingredients known to cause cancer.
FORMALDEHYDE: Formaldehyde has been classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) as a Group 1 carcinogen, right there with Asbestos.
Several studies have identified statistically significant positive associations between exposure to formaldehyde and cancer at other sites ( besides nasal ), including the oral cavity, oro- and hypo- pharynx, lanynx, lung, brain, pancreas, Hodgkin lymphoma. and multiple myeloma. – IARC
According to the CDC you should avoid all contact with Formaldehyde.
Now. let me address the claim that Formaldehyde in vaccines is magically safe because it is produced naturally in the human body in minuscule amounts.
There is a serious difference between what the body itself creates and maintains careful balance of, and environmental exposure. The FDA claims that “exposure to formaldehyde from vaccines differs from environmental exposure because the small amount of formaldehyde via injection with a vaccine occurs briefly and only occasionally”.
Can the FDA list sources proving this to be true? Can the FDA provide credible scientific research proving that Formaldehyde is safe, or broken down safely or effectively detoxed by the body when injected, even though it can cause cancer when associated with every other orifice of the body, no matter how ‘brief’ that contact may be?
And does the FDA consider 26 vaccinations or, 26 exposures to Formaldehyde before 24 months of age, and 69 exposures by age 18 “occasional”?
Do YOU see a problem here?
ALUMINUM SULFATE: Commonly known as Sulfuric Acid, this substance is so toxic you are supposed to seek medical attention if it comes in contact with your skin. But, it’s magically safe in vaccines, right? Don’t forget that vaccine safety conversion magic 😉
BENZETHONIUM CHLORIDE: There is some controversy over whether or not Benethonium is a carcinogenic agent, however I find significant enough information in my research to point it out as a serious potential health hazard. Please read through the sources I have listed at the end to make up your own mind.
MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE: First off, anyone who tells you that MSG is safe is either a fast food addict and justifying this for themselves, or they are blatantly lying to you.
MSG is an excitotoxin, which is how it gets you hooked. It excites your brain cells to the point of death, and leaves you wanting more. MSG is also associated with the acceleration of cancer growth, as seen in animal studies.
By the way, how are mice used in the study of obesity drugs, when no species of mice are naturally fat? They first must be made fat by being fed MSG, which triples the amount of insulin produced by the pancreas. Can’t test weight loss drugs on regular sized mice 😉 But wait, could this be in part why Type 1 diabetes mellitus ( auto immune attack on the pancreas ) is a side effect of some childhood vaccines?
That last bit is my speculation, to be fair. I have no clue the exact mechanism by which – to use scientific lingo – vaccines cause T1DM. But I believe it’s important for us all to start thinking for ourselves and trying to connect some dots here.
MONKEY KIDNEY CELLS: African Green Monkey ( Vero ) Kidney cells are a listed ingredient used in manufacturing for culturing purposes. Again, I know this sounds sensationalized, but if you’re one of the few people who cares enough to read this far, you definitely owe it to yourself to look into this particular fact further.
First of all, the mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of combining monkey DNA with human DNA is completely unknown. Second, Vero cells are self-replicating. What does this mean upon introduction into our own bodies? I don’t know, but don’t you think that’s a good question?
One huge problem with the continued use of monkey kidney cells is that they contain viruses that may expose us to disease, including cancer.
The devastating SV-40 virus is a perfect example of this.
From 1950 to 1963 around 63 million people were exposed to the deadly SV-40 cancer virus through polio vaccines, that were actually left on the shelves for continued use before the public knew anything about it. It literally still gets me how awful the history of vaccines is…however that’s another post entirely.
Dr. Jonas Salk, Joseph L. Melnick of Baylor University in Texas, Dr. Michael B. Shimkin of the National Cancer Institute, and many other officials came forward in defense of the Polio vaccine, saying that no sufficient evidence had shown a link between SV-40 virus and cancer in humans.
Maurice Hilleman, microbiologist, developer of some 36+ vaccines, and former Chief of Merk Pharmaceutical’s vaccine division is famously on audio record with colleagues, grotesquely laughing about how he accidentally brought AIDS and SV-40 virus into the country with infected African Green monkeys back in the days of “crude science”. One of the men in the recording laughs and says, “What Merk won’t do to make a Vaccine.”
The truth of this statement makes me sick for humanity. However nothing surprises me with Merk, the same company who, in recent years, received a mere slap on the wrist in fines for killing 60,000 people with Vioxx, and the very same company who literally burned documents proving an autism-MMR connection.
Ironically the MMR coverup is considered controversial. I digress.
The point is, who decided that parents ought to be mandated by law to inject African Green Monkey Kidney cells into their little children in this experiment?
The fact that vaccines can lead to infections and infestations, and lymphatic and immune disorders, as listed in the adverse events section of the package inserts, should be cause for question in the cancer equation.
The fact is that we all have cancer cells in our bodies. The question is whether or not we develop disease, based on environmental and lifestyle factors. Refined white sugar feeds cancer cells. Fast food feeds cancer cells. Chemical exposures feed cancer cells.
An acidic cellular environment is a literal playground for cancer proliferation.
So what is the net effect of toxic vaccine ingredients on our bodies? Due to the lack of adequate safety studies we can honestly only speculate based upon the individual ingredients listed, many of which are mutagenic, neurotoxic, and carcinogenic, as discussed.
But what is the synergistic effect when combined into one cocktail, and paired with 15 separate cocktails of vaccines given in 69 doses? We simply don’t know.
The carcinogenic potential of childhood vaccines has not been evaluated. And furthermore there has never been a single long-term, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study done to examine the difference in health outcomes for vaccinated vs unvaccinated populations. What short-term studies are preformed use other vaccines in place of a true placebo.
This raises some important questions for me as a mom, as it should for you. For one, I’m no scientist, but can I assume two plus two still equals four here, and that two carcinogens in one product means twice the health hazard for my child?
The pharmaceutical industry has an undeniable track record of ruthless deceit when it comes to the health and safety of consumers. Am I now to simply take their word on safety at face-value, simply because I’m told to by the media?
Even though listed potential side effects include immunodeficiency, and other disorders of the immune system?
Furthermore, do we as Americans need to settle for crappy vaccines, simply because they’re cheaper and more profitable for the pharmaceutical industry to roll out?
Will history continue to repeat itself, and will profits continue to take precedence over divine human beings?
I hope, if you made it through this post, I will have caused you to question some things, and more importantly, that I’ve inspired you to read, read, read.
From every angle, opinion, and source.
You deserve to be healthy, FREE, and to make informed decisions for your family. Don’t ever take my word for it.
Hugs’ n health, Ashley Lynn
Environmental Working Group: myth that cancer is declining
Carcinogenesis studies with Benzethonium Chloride
Further reading on Benzethonium Chloride
Infant Rhesus monkey suffers brain death after subcutaneous injection of MSG
MSG the Truth About Cancer
Mercola, MSG the Silent Killer lurking in your cabinets
Mercola on Type 1 Diabetes and Vaccinations
The introduction of SV-40 through early Polio vaccines
History and Characterization of the Vero cell line
SV-40 a startling discovery
Natural News, SV-40 chorus of denial
More reading on Type 1 Diabetes and vaccines